Skip to main content
· 11/15/1995

Cullen v. EH Friedrich Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 910 F. Supp. 815
  • 1995 WL 736486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding as preempted defamation claim arising from letters prepared by company president as part of grievance proceedings
  • “[a]llowing employees governed by a CBA to assert an independent common law claim of wrongful discharge would not be a commendable practice. It would deprive employer and union to establish a uniform and exclusive method for orderly settlement of employee grievances”
  • “Allowing employees governed by a [collective bargaining agreement] to assert an independent, common law claim of wrongful discharge would ... deprive employer and union of the ability to establish a uniform and exclusive method for orderly settlement of employee grievances.’ ”
  • under Massachusetts law, “[t]he cause of action [for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy] is only available to ‘at-will’ employees”
  • Under Massachusetts law, “[t]he cause of action [for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy] is only available to ‘at-will’ employees.”
  • Under Massachusetts law, \[t]he cause of action [for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy] is only available to 'at-will' employees.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ponsor, Neiman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.