Skip to main content
· 3/3/1973

Cullen v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Citations

  • 507 P.2d 353
  • 211 Kan. 368
  • 1973 Kan. LEXIS 400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[AJnything received by way of a covenant not to sue operates as a payment pro tanto upon any judgment obtained against the others.”
  • \[A]nything received by way of a covenant not to sue operates as a payment pro tanto upon any judgment obtained against the others.\
  • \[Playments made to the victim from non-collateral sources-such as the tortfeasor's insurance company or a joint tortfea-sor-reduce the tortfeasor's liability.\
  • \[P]ayments made to the victim from non-collateral sources—such as the tortfeasor's insurance company or a joint tortfeasor—reduce the tortfeasor's liability.\
  • no illegal assignment of tort claim where in surer had interest in wrongful death action
  • Loan receipt agreement ineffective but held to be valid as covenant not to sue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.