· 3/3/1973
Cullen v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Citations
- 507 P.2d 353
- 211 Kan. 368
- 1973 Kan. LEXIS 400
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[AJnything received by way of a covenant not to sue operates as a payment pro tanto upon any judgment obtained against the others.”
- \[A]nything received by way of a covenant not to sue operates as a payment pro tanto upon any judgment obtained against the others.\
- \[Playments made to the victim from non-collateral sources-such as the tortfeasor's insurance company or a joint tortfea-sor-reduce the tortfeasor's liability.\
- \[P]ayments made to the victim from non-collateral sourcessuch as the tortfeasor's insurance company or a joint tortfeasorreduce the tortfeasor's liability.\
- no illegal assignment of tort claim where in surer had interest in wrongful death action
- Loan receipt agreement ineffective but held to be valid as covenant not to sue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.