Culhane v. New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[s]uspect classifications generally include those based on race, alienage, and national origin”
• observing that “[s]uspect classifications generally include those based on race, alienage, and national origin”
• “When the meaning of a statute is clear, it is both unnecessary and improper to resort to legislative history to divine congressional intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).