Skip to main content
· 3/6/1997

Culhane v. Denisewich

Citations

  • 689 A.2d 1062
  • 1997 R.I. LEXIS 56
  • 1997 WL 100923

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • limiting the Court's inquiry to whether the punishment ordered was within the authority of the committee
  • “The review by this [C]ourt of the findings of a hearing committee convened pursuant to the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights is both limited and highly deferential.”
  • \[t]he review by this Court of the findings of a hearing committee convened pursuant to the Law Enforcement Officers' Bill of Rights is both limited and highly deferential\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberger, Bourcier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.