· 11/16/2023
Cuidad de Nuestros Angeles I, LLC v. Inverrary Resort Hotel Condominium Association, Inc.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, in light of Miranda’s use of the FBI advisement, “it cannot be said that the Miranda court regarded an express reference to the temporal durability of this right as elemental to a valid warning”
- upholding warning that “You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford to hire an attorney, one will be appointed to represent you without charge before any questioning if you wish”
- “[I]t cannot be said that the Miranda court regarded an express reference to the temporal durability of this right as elemental to a valid warning.”
- ''[fit cannot be said that the Miranda court regarded an express reference to the temporal durability of this right as elemental to a valid warning,’’
- \[I]t cannot be said that the Miranda court regarded an express reference to the temporal durability of [the right to an attorney] as elemental to a valid warning.\
- “[The defendant] offers no rationale for a reasonable person’s belief that the clear, unmodified statement ‘[y]ou have the right to an attorney’ would be regarded as time-limited.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.