Cuffee v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress where plaintiff alleged that one supervisor “subjected” her to “sexual advances” for five months, another impregnated her then cut off contact, and company transferred and demoted her
• “[L]ike Title VII, the MHRA [] require[s] that would-be plaintiffs first file a charge of discrimination with an enforcement agency.”
• noting futility of amendment as to unexhausted claims
• mere checking of box insufficient to preserve claim
• considering defendant attached EEOC charge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).