Cuevas v. W.E. Walker, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “questions of . . . whether the plaintiff should have been aware of the defect[] are normally questions for the jury” (quoting Bogue v. R. & M. Grocery, 553 So. 2d 545 (Ala. 1989))
• stating that “questions of . . . whether the plaintiff should have been aware of the defect[] are normally questions for the jury” (quoting Bogue v. R. & M. Grocery, 553 So. 2d 545 (Ala. 1989))
• conflicting testimony constituted evidence sufficient to raise genuine issues of material fact which precluded entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant in slip-and-fall case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).