Cuevas Gonzalez, Wilfredo v. D De Correccion Y Rehabilitacion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• criticizing inmate for filing “method-of-execution” challenge pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 more than a decade after the completion of his direct appeal, and shortly before his execution
• criticizing inmate for filing \method-of-execution\ challenge pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 more than a decade after the completion of his direct appeal, and shortly before his execution
• vacating stay of execution and explaining that the inmate’s claim could have been brought “more than a decade ago”
• criticizing inmate for filing “method-of-execution” challenge pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 more than a decade after the completion of his direct appeal, and shortly before his scheduled execution
• vacating stay of execution because of the “last-minute nature of” the application
• criticizing an inmate for bringing a § 1983 method of execution claim (challenging lethal gas) shortly before his execution date when the claim was not raised earlier but “could have been brought more than a decade ago”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).