Cudd v. Crownhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Wisconsin recognizes a “cause of action for the intentional interference with another’s prospective contractual relation”
• noting that a plaintiff has a cause of action under Wisconsin law to protect against “interference with existing contractual relations and for tortious interference with prospective contractual relations”
• citing, Roach v. Keane, 73 Wis. 2d 524, 536, 243 N.W.2d 508, 515 (1976)
• verdict cannot be based on \mere speculation\
• verdict cannot be based on \mere speculation\
• adopting the provisions of RESTATEMENT (SECOND

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).