Cudahy Packing Co. v. Luyben

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying, inter alia, \costs for `internal copying' of documents by [prevailing defendant's] counsel produced for discovery\
• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying, inter alia, “costs for ‘internal copying’ of documents by [prevailing defendant’s] counsel produced for discovery”
• stating that financial hardship resulting in workforce reduction as part of cost-cutting measures constituted a legitimate, nondis-eriminatory reason for plaintiffs termination
• stating that a plaintiff may establish a claim of discrimination with direct evidence
• finding that employer’s reason of significant financial hardship was a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for employment terminations
• stating in his affidavit that he “certainly took ultimate responsibility for the late filing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).