Cucinotta v. Hanulak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the appellate briefs clearly show that reversal of both courts was on different grounds
• “Small Claims Part has no equitable powers and cannot grant equitable relief’
• small claims court has no equity jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wilson v. CRL Management, Inc.
  Rochester City Court· 2006-10-18· cited 8×
• Davis v. Monroe Muffler/Brake & Service, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2008-04-25· cited 1×
• Robinson v. Robles
  Rochester City Court· 2010-05-27· cited 1×
• Hollingsworth v. Regional Transit Service, Inc.
  Rochester City Court· 2008-04-30

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schiffman v. Deluxe Caterers of Shelter Rock, Inc.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-04-02· cited 11×
• Lockwood v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-07-03· cited 7×