Cuartas v. Cuartas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting jurisdiction pursuant to rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii) of an order denying former husband’s motion for contempt and for immediate change of primary residence
• “Implicit in the proscriptions of [Rule 1.110(h)], especially in the family law context, is purposeful assurance that all interested parties are aware that a new proceeding with potentially serious consequences is afoot.”
• “As with most rules, a litigant can waive the benefit of the rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).