Cuaresma v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant merely acquiesced to authority where officers used harassment, intimidation, and threats of arrest to convince the defendant to consent to a search, and told the defendant that his truck would be searched regardless of his consent
• driver of truck made an illegal lane change by failing to signal in violation of O.C.G.A. § 40-6-123(b)
• “[i]f an officer witnesses a traffic violation, the ensuing stop is never pretextual, regardless of the officer’s subjective intentions, and the officer has probable cause to make the stop”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).