California Court of Appeal· 5/13/1992
Cuadros v. Superior Court
Citations
- 6 Cal. App. 4th 671
- 8 Cal. Rptr. 2d 18
- 92 Daily Journal DAR 6473
- 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4100
- 1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 613
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- doctrine of equitable estoppel requires balancing of 10 equities and “is a factual question entrusted to the trial court’s discretion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hopkins v. KedzierskiCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-04-16· cited 36×
- People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-12-22· cited 33×
- Carr v. Barnabey's Hotel Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1994-03-08· cited 32×
- Hawkins v. Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2004-12-22· cited 31×
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-08-15· cited 22×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1994-04-29
- Doe v. MartenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2020-06-04
- Adoption of S.S.California Court of Appeal· 2021-12-10
- People v. Accredited Surety & CasualtyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2022-04-07
- Sirott v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal· 2022-05-05
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1984-06-07· cited 727×
- Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-08-16· cited 103×
- Brookview Condominium Owners' Ass'n v. Heltzer Enterprises-BrookviewCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-02-28· cited 21×
- Mayberry v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal· 1966-08-18· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.