Cty. of Hudson v. Selective Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the fact that employee’s job re- quired him to be at a location where he was injured meant the injury arose from his work
• “[W]here the language of a policy will support two meanings, one favorable to the insured and the other favorable to the insurer, the interpretation sustaining coverage should be applied.”
• “[The insurer] could reasonably anticipate that Malpere would use subcontractors to perform its work and that such subcontractors would send representatives to the worksite in preparation for submitting their bids.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).