CTS Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “hiding an argument” in a footnote “and then articulating it in only a conclusory fashion” is “forfeiture”
• explaining that we need not address cursory arguments
• “A footnote is no place’ to make a substantive legal argument on appeal; hiding an argument there and then articulating it in only a conclusory fashion results in forfeiture.”
• argument made in conclusory fashion forfeited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).