CSR, Inc. v. McGinnis (In re McGinnis)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “sep- arately held, gifted property [i]s not subject to the presump- tion of equal contribution”
• explaining that “sep- arately held, gifted property [i]s not subject to the presump- tion of equal contribution”
• explaining that “sep- arately held, gifted property [i]s not subject to the presump- tion of equal contribution”
• the appellate court will not interfere with the trial court’s determination of what constitutes a “just and equitable” support award unless there is an abuse of discretion
• “Well-established case law further establishes that a domestic relations proceed- ing remains undecided until a written judgment is entered, even when the court has ruled from the bench.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).