C.S. v. Prince George's County Department of Social Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing in detail and analyzing the legislative history of the child abuse statute over the past thirty years
• noting that “[i]t is often necessary to look at the development of a statute to discern legislative intent that may not be as clear upon initial examination of the current language of the statute.” (quoting Condon v. State, 332 Md. 481, 492, 632 A.2d 753, 758 (1993
• noting that \[i]t is often necessary to look at the development of a statute to discern legislative intent that may not be as clear upon initial examination of the current language of the statute.\ (quoting Condon v. State, 332 Md. 481, 492, 632 A.2d 753, 758 (1993
• unsuccessfully “arguing that judicial review was not provided for in the statute and that the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) providing judicial review in some cases do not apply to findings of indicated child abuse”
• unsuccessfully \arguing that judicial review was not provided for in the statute and that the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) providing judicial review in some cases do not apply to findings of indicated child abuse\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).