· 1/8/1996
Crystal Lakes Water & Sewer Ass'n v. Backlund
Citations
- 908 P.2d 534
- 20 Brief Times Rptr. 7
- 1996 Colo. LEXIS 2
- 1996 WL 5837
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that water courts have jurisdiction over ancillary matters that \directly affect the outcome of water matters\
- stating that the water court lacks jurisdiction over an issue that would not directly affect the outcome in the case
- \The specialized expertise of the water court is essential in determining whether wells are subject to a plan for augmentation. Only a water court can issue a decree approving a plan for augmentation.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lohr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.