Skip to main content
· 1/8/1996

Crystal Lakes Water & Sewer Ass'n v. Backlund

Citations

  • 908 P.2d 534
  • 20 Brief Times Rptr. 7
  • 1996 Colo. LEXIS 2
  • 1996 WL 5837

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that water courts have jurisdiction over ancillary matters that \directly affect the outcome of water matters\
  • stating that the water court lacks jurisdiction over an issue that would not directly affect the outcome in the case
  • \The specialized expertise of the water court is essential in determining whether wells are subject to a plan for augmentation. Only a water court can issue a decree approving a plan for augmentation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lohr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.