Crysen/Montenay Energy Co. v. E & C Trading Ltd. (In Re Crysen/Montenay Energy Co.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• would not be just to apply amended rule to conduct that occurred and motions that were filed prior to amendment
• fourteen-month delay in applying to proceed via letters rogatory and more than six-month delay in subsequent service on deponent
• would not be just to apply amended rule to conduct that occurred and motions that were filed prior to amendment
• would not be just to apply amended rule to conduct that occurred and motions that were filed prior to amendment
• the passage of 14 months before plaintiff attempted service precluded a finding of diligence
• despite plaintiffs claim that it was confirming foreign address and preparing groundwork for service via letters rogatory, lack of diligence still found for 14 month delay which transpired before plaintiff attempted to perfect service by filing application for letters rogatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).