Cry, Inc. v. Mill Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the basic inquiry in determining whether a party is indispensable concerns whether justice can be done in the absence of a third party”
• noting that a plurality opinion of this Court lacks the authority of precedent
• noting that a plurality opinion of this Court lacks the authority of precedent
• stating “[i]t is axiomatic that a plurality opinion of this court is without precedential authority, which means that no lower court is bound by its reasoning.”
• action in which the Department of Environmental Resources was joined as an indispensable party constitutes action against the Commonwealth government for purposes of Section 761 of Judicial Code

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).