Cruz-Samayoa v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “to preserve the agency’s dispositive conclusion for appellate review, [petitioners] were . . . under an obligation to challenge the adverse determination on some ground”
• stating that “[i]n failing to assert any argument challenging” an agency’s determination, the petitioners had waived the argument
• stating that “[i]n failing to assert any argument challenging” an agency’s determination, the petitioners had waived the argument
• stating that “[i]n failing to assert any argument challenging” an agency’s determination, the petitioners had waived the argument
• “In failing to assert any argument challenging the agency finding that they can internally relocate, and by, in fact, asserting that they did not ‘need to do so,’ the matter is waived.”
• “[T]here is a marked distinction between persecution and criminal prosecution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).