Skip to main content
· 3/20/2008

Cruz-Packer v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 539 F. Supp. 2d 181
  • 70 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 163
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21444
  • 2008 WL 732112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[t]he administrative requirements of . . . the ADEA are not jurisdictional”
  • dismissing Title VII and ADEA claims against the individual defendants because neither provides for liability against individual defendants in their personal capacities
  • “the Equal Pay Act do[es] not require a plaintiff to first exhaust administrative remedies before proceeding to court”
  • “Under a formal work-sharing agreement, filing a formal charge with the EEOC satisfies any requirement to file a formal charge with the District’s OHR, and vice-versa.”
  • “[T]he Equal Pay Act do[es] not require a plaintiff to first exhaust administrative remedies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard W. Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.