· 12/12/2023
Cruz Berrios, Lilliam v. Exparte
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring subject of involuntary commitment proceedings to appear in shackles violated petitioner's rights under the due process clause
- remanding to district court to “determine whether prejudice resulted” to habeas petitioner by being forced to appear with restraints at civil-commitment trial
- “Shackling [or] restraining ... a [party] ... must be limited to eases urgently demanding that action, based upon a balancing of the [party’s] rights to be present and to have an impartial jury with the need for orderly administration of justice.”
- addressing issue of custody even though respondent did not raise issue
- addressing issue of custody even though respondent did not raise issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.