New Mexico Supreme Court· 2/18/1982
Cruttenden v. Mantura
Citations
- 640 P.2d 932
- 97 N.M. 432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that creditor could not garnish wages payable by subsidiary to its employee by serving writ of garnishment on parent corporation
- holding that creditor could not garnish wages payable by subsidiary to its employee by serving writ of garnishment on parent corporation
- stating that having directors or officers in common is one factor in determining if a corporation is the alter ego of another
- stating that having directors or officers in common is one factor in determining if a corporation is the alter ego of another
- stating that other factors in determining alter ego are whether \[t]he parent corporation pays the salaries or expenses or losses of the subsidiary\ and whether \[t]he parent corporation finances the subsidiary\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- refusing to permit assertion of jurisdiction over parent company based on acts of subsidiary absent proof demonstrating that corporate separateness should be disregarded
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riordan, Easley, Sosa, Payne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hertz v. HertzNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-01-11· cited 68×
- Sonntag v. ShawNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2001-04-19· cited 61×
- Scott v. AZL Resources, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1988-04-18· cited 43×
- Garcia v. CoffmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-06-17· cited 36×
- Jemez Agency, Inc. v. Cigna Corp.D. New Mexico· 1994-10-12· cited 28×
- Alto Eldorado Partnership v. Amrep Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-09-28· cited 20×
- Plains Electric Generation & Transmission Cooperative v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1998-10-08· cited 16×
- Allen v. Toshiba Corp.D. New Mexico· 1984-06-15· cited 16×
- Walker v. THI OF NEW MEXICO AT HOBBS CENTERD. New Mexico· 2011-07-06· cited 15×
- Robertson v. Rocky Mountain Metals, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-06-20· cited 3×
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Policy Number 501/ Nb03acmd v. NanceD. New Mexico· 2007-03-09· cited 2×
- CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON v. NanceD. New Mexico· 2007-03-09
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Getz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 234×
- Fish v. EastTenth Circuit· 1940-06-29· cited 145×
- Getz v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of USNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1977-03-11· cited 64×
- Barber's Super Markets, Inc. v. StrykerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1972-07-07· cited 45×
- Virginia M. Edgar v. Fred Jones Lincoln-Mercury of Oklahoma City, Inc. And Fred Jones, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1975-10-24· cited 35×
- State Ex Rel. Grinnell Co. v. MacPhersonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1957-03-29· cited 15×
- INTERN. U., UNITED AUTO., ETC. v. Cardwell Mfg. Co.D. Kansas· 1976-05-11· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.