Crutchfield v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court properly denied leave to amend when a pro se plaintiff never “separately filed a motion with a proposed amended complaint”
• noting that court need not grant pro se plaintiff leave to amend where a motion to dismiss was filed, distinguishing cases where court sua sponte screened and dismissed complaint
• noting that court need not grant pro se plaintiff leave to amend where a motion to dismiss was filed, distinguishing cases where court sua sponte screened and dismissed complaint
• noting that court need not grant pro se plaintiff leave to amend where a motion to dismiss was filed, distinguishing cases where court sua sponte screened and dismissed complaint
• noting that court need not grant pro se plaintiff leave to amend where a motion to dismiss was filed, distinguishing cases where court sua sponte screened and dismissed complaint
• finding a district court properly denied a motion to amend when a plaintiff never filed a separate motion with a proposed amended complaint as required by Rule 15(a)(2) and the local rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).