Skip to main content

Crutchfield v. State

Citations

  • 603 S.E.2d 462
  • 269 Ga. App. 69
  • 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2743
  • 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 1064

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that defendant’s refusal to answer when trial court explicitly asked if he wanted to fire his counsel and defendant’s additional expressions of dissatisfaction with his attorney did not constitute an unequivocal assertion to represent himself
  • \[S]tatements that amount to nothing more than expressions of dissatisfaction with current counsel do not trigger any requirement that the court hold a hearing under Faretta or that the defendant be allowed to proceed pro se.\
  • an unequivocal assertion of the right to represent oneself, made prior to trial, \should be followed by a hearing to ensure that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waives the right to counsel and understands the disadvantages of self-representation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Blackburn, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.