Crumpton v. Mike Stevens, MGA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the county court erred by denying Crumpton’s attorney’s fees on the ground that the fees were in excess of justice court’s jurisdictional limits because the fees were incurred in prosecuting the suit in the county court
• holding that the county court erred by denying Crumpton’s attorney’s fees on the ground that the fees were in excess of justice court’s jurisdictional limits because the fees were incurred in prosecuting the suit in the county court
• pleading of attorney’s fees on appeal to county court in amount greater than original jurisdiction did not deprive county court of jurisdiction
• pleading of attorney's fees on appeal to county court in amount greater than original jurisdiction did not deprive county court of jurisdiction
• referring to the “amount in controversy” as the value of the case at filing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).