Crumpton v. Keisling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing that statute to \require that some notice of the contended defect be given to the Secretary of State\
• construing that statute to “require that some notice of the contended defect be given to the Secretary of State”
• the court’s function is to review for substantial compliance with ORS 250.085(4), not to determine whether a petitioner’s proposed title is better
• “The question on review is not whether a more exact or better ballot title may be written, but only whether the one certified * * * substantially complies with the requirements of statute.”
• court’s role is not to determine whether a petitioner’s proposed ballot title is “better” than the certified ballot title, but only to determine whether the certified ballot title substantially complies with ORS 250.035; certified ballot title substantially complied with ORS 250.035(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).