Crumley v. Lutz
Citations
- 173 Pa. 211
- 33 A. 879
- 1896 Pa. LEXIS 684
Syllabus
<p>Practice, 8. G. — Quashing appeal — Exceptions—Evidence.</p> <p>An appeal by a plaintiff in ejectment from the refusal of the court below to arrest a judgment on a verdict in favor of defendant will be quashed where the record shows that no exception was filed to any action of the court below, although the reason suggested for arresting the judgment was because the court below called a jury, and in the absence of the plaintiff or Ms counsel, and without testimony being produced by plaintiff, took a verdict for defendant.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- doctrine of laches applies in workers’ compensation proceédings
- doctrine of laches applies in workers' compensation proceedings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dean, Fell, Gbeen, McCollum, Mitchell, Stebbett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.