Crum v. Maricopa County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recovery of double damages is discretionary and not mandatory
• noting “may” is permissive, not mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2003-10-06· cited 65×
• Walter v. Wilkinson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-10-03· cited 24×
• Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-03-14· cited 12×
• City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-09-18· cited 11×
• Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2002-10-18· cited 9×
• D'Amico v. Structural I Co.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-04-03· cited 4×
• Regional Care Services Corp. v. Companion Life Insurance
  D. Arizona· 2012-04-24

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schade v. Diethrich
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1988-09-20· cited 96×
• Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Management, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-04-11· cited 65×
• Apache East, Inc. v. Wiegand
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-05-16· cited 37×
• Lisa v. Strom
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-02-28· cited 34×
• Patton v. County of Mohave
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-02-05· cited 16×
• Daggett v. Jackie Fine Arts, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-11-20· cited 15×
• Ayres v. Red Cloud Mills, Ltd.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-11-27· cited 6×
• Cummings v. Aviation Specialties Trade Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-09-19· cited 6×