Crum v. Dodrill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Rule 12(b)(6) is the vehicle for raising “(1) a challenge to the ‘sufficiency of the pleading’ under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2); or (2) a challenge to the legal cognizability of the claim[s]”
• noting that “the mandate to read the papers of pro se litigants generously makes it appropriate to consider plaintiff’s additional materials, such as his opposition memorandum,” to the extent those materials “are consistent with the allegations in the complaint”
• discussing “the mandate to read the papers of pro se litigants generously”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).