Skip to main content
· 12/16/2005

Crum & Forster Specialty Co. v. Safety Fire Sprinkler Corp.

Citations

  • 405 F. Supp. 2d 223
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33209
  • 2005 WL 3446262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The public policy considerations behind this rule [that an elevator maintenance company owes a duty of care to the public] are too obvious to merit comment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Block

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.