· 12/16/2005
Crum & Forster Specialty Co. v. Safety Fire Sprinkler Corp.
Citations
- 405 F. Supp. 2d 223
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33209
- 2005 WL 3446262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The public policy considerations behind this rule [that an elevator maintenance company owes a duty of care to the public] are too obvious to merit comment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Block
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.