Skip to main content
· 10/8/1969

Cruis Along Boats, Inc. v. Langley

Citations

  • 257 A.2d 184
  • 255 Md. 139
  • 1969 Md. LEXIS 690

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “in the absence of abuse of discretion, a ruling on a motion for continuance or postponement [by a trial court], is not reviewable.”
  • finding no abuse of discretion where an unavailable lead attorney could be replaced with associate counsel at trial
  • finding no abuse of discretion where an unavailable lead attorney could be replaced with associate counsel at trial
  • trial counsel became unavailable due to extension of New Jersey trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hammond, C.J., and Marbury, Barnes, Finan and Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.