Skip to main content
· 2/2/1934

Cruikshank v. Cruickshank

Citations

  • 115 N.J. Eq. 322
  • 170 A. 659
  • 1934 N.J. LEXIS 763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the State of Tennessee had jurisdiction over the case when the evidence showed the defendant passed the check in Tennessee
  • distinguishing between cash and credit transactions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cueiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.