· 2/2/1934
Cruikshank v. Cruickshank
Citations
- 115 N.J. Eq. 322
- 170 A. 659
- 1934 N.J. LEXIS 763
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the State of Tennessee had jurisdiction over the case when the evidence showed the defendant passed the check in Tennessee
- distinguishing between cash and credit transactions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cueiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.