Croyle v. Dellape

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an appeal lies from the entry of judgment, rather than the entry of post-trial motions
• affirming trial court’s order directing defendants to remove encroachments partially obstructing an easement, even though plaintiffs could still reach their lots through the unobstructed portion and had no plan to develop the lots
• “As a general rule, a statute of limitations defense must be raised in new matter or else it is waived. See Pa.R.C.P. 1030(a).”
• “As a general rule, a statute of limitations defense must be raised in new matter or else it is waived.”
• “An action in ejectment may be brought where the property interest claimed to be encroached upon is an easement or right[-]of[-]way.”
• “The fact that the [plaintiffs] have no plans to develop their lots does not change the fact that they have an immediate right to access those lots through [the subject easement].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).