Crowson v. WOOLARD BROS., INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court's initial finding that claimant was permanently and totally disabled and subsequent finding that he was 98% disabled was not a clerical error, but a change in the trial court's initial findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Vann v. Cook
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2008-02-01· cited 121×
• Deramus Hearing Aid Center, Inc. v. AMERICAN HEARING AID ASSOCIATES, INC.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2006-07-28· cited 12×
• Woodward v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2008-08-01· cited 8×
• Cox v. Cox
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2016-06-10· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McGiboney v. McGiboney
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1996-07-12· cited 30×
• Michael v. Michael
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1984-07-11· cited 27×
• Wilson v. Leck's 66 Service Station
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1987-07-08· cited 14×
• Wilson v. Banks
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1992-12-18· cited 1×