Skip to main content
· 7/30/2010

Crown v. CHASE HOME FINANCE

Citations

  • 41 So. 3d 978
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11096
  • 2010 WL 2975410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no prejudice where proposed amended answer was filed after filing of motion for summary judgment even though it raised several affirmative defenses not addressed in motion for summary judgment
  • no prejudice where leave to amend was sought after the filing of the motion for summary judgment and asserted 3 defenses not addressed in the motion for summary judgment
  • all doubts should be resolved in favor of allowing amendment unless it clearly appears that allowing amendment would prejudice opposing party, privilege to amend has been abused, or amendment would be futile

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Evander, Griffin, Sawaya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.