Crown Printing Co. v. Charles Beck Co.

Citations

• 73 Pa. Super. 419
• 1920 Pa. Super. LEXIS 30

Syllabus

<p>Warranty — Breach of warranty — Machinery—Gaise for jury.</p> <p>In an action to recover the amount paid on account of a lease of a printing press, because of alleged breach of warranty, the case is for the jury and a verdict for the plaintiff will be sustained where the evidence tends to show that the press was leased for a certain purpose, that it failed to dc the work required of it, and did not come up to the representations of the lessor.</p> <p>In such an action it is immaterial that the plaintiff failed to prove the execution or existence of the lease, as set forth in plaintiff’s statement, when the case was tried on the theory that the printing press did not perform its work as represented.</p>