Supreme Court· 2/19/1923
Crown Die & Tool Co. v. Nye Tool & MacHine Works
Citations
- 261 U.S. 24
- 43 S. Ct. 254
- 67 L. Ed. 516
- 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2526
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expressing concern when right to sue for infringement is “severed” from an interest in the patent title
- “All that the Government grants and protects is the power to exclude others from making, using or vending dining the grant.”
- interest in patent not a separable interest which can be assigned; instrument attempting to transfer the statutory cause of action in this manner is ineffective
- the right to sue “carried no part of the title to the patent or interest in it”
- “[T]he injury inflicted by an act of infringement falls upon the individual who owns the monopoly at the date of the infringement.”
- “[T]he injury inflicted by an act of infringement falls upon the individual who owns the monopoly at the date of the infringement.” (quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taft
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.