Crown Cork & Seal Company v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that remand was unnecessary because the agency had \suggested no alternative bases for upholding\ its determination
• finding that a letter could not be read to threaten plant closure because it linked job preservation to the plant’s ability to compete regardless of unionization
• finding that a letter could not be read to threaten plant closure because it linked job preservation to the plant’s ability to compete regardless of unionization
• holding protected an employer’s prediction that unionization would increase costs, risking the loss of cost-sensitive pro jects and consequent layoffs, notwithstanding employer’s failure to emphasize that the loss of such projects was only a risk and not an absolute certainty
• holding protected an employer's pre- diction that unionization would increase costs, risking the loss of cost-sensitive projects and consequent layoffs, notwith- standing employer's failure to emphasize that the loss of such projects was only a risk and not an absolute certainty
• “[Y]our job security depends on our being able to provide [our buyer] with the best product and the best service at the best price.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).