Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the provision promising coverage “until death” was “not explicit vesting language”
• deciding a question on appeal rather than remanding because “remand would be inefficient and unnecessary”
• “A clause expressly limiting the duration of the retirement health benefits to the duration of the [agreement] is inconsistent with an intent to vest health benefits for life.” (internal marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).