Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. Department of Energy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a court’s “opinions are not intended as mere first drafts, subject to revision and reconsideration at a litigant’s pleasure”
• denying motion to reconsider certain conclusions in summary judg‐ ment decision
• denying motion to reconsider certain conclusions in summary judg‐ ment decision
• “this Court’s opinions are not intended as mere first drafts, subject to revision and reconsideration at a litigant’s pleasure”
• “[T]his Court’s opinions are not intended as mere first drafts, subject to revision and reconsideration at a litigant’s pleasure.”
• “[T]his 17 Court’s opinions are not intended as mere first drafts, subject to revision and reconsideration at a litigant’s pleasure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).