Crowley v. Harvey & Battey, P.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the fact the client has accepted the benefits of the settlement and judicially sought to enforce its terms are not bars to maintenance of a malpractice claim”
• “where a client alleges his former attorney was negligent in advising him to accept a settlement, that alleged negligence is not a ground for attack ing the settlement itself but rather is a matter left for a malpractice suit between the client and his attorney.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).