Crowley v. Courville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that evidence of differential treatment without more is insufficient to establish malice or bad faith in a selective treatment claim
• dismissing plaintiff’s due process claim because the Zoning Board had the authority to grant variances
• “[A] demonstration of different treatment from persons similarly situated, without more, would not establish malice or bad faith.”
• refusal to apply zoning variance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).