Crowley Ex Rel. Estate of Crowley v. Spivey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming admission of summary of thirty-one pages of telephone records where trial court concluded summary chart \would save the jury from having to decipher for themselves the long and somewhat confusing\ records
• upholding the trial court’s ruling on a motion to amend absent an abuse of discretion and noting evidence of circumstances such as inexcusable delay, surprise to the adverse party, or the like will justify the denial of a motion to amend
• one who undertakes to protect another from harm by a third party has a duty to exercise reasonable care
• “[0]ne who assumes to act, even though under no obligation to do so, may become subject to the duty to act with due care.”
• “[O]ne who assumes to act, even though under ho obligation to do so, may become subject to the duty to act with due care.”
• evidence is relevant if it tends to establish or to make more or less probable some matter in issue upon which it directly or indirectly bears

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).