Crowell v. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[a] breach of the rule established in Edwards is [ ] a technical violation of Miranda, not a Fifth Amendment violation.”
• holding that \a technical violation of Miranda [is not necessarily] a Fifth Amendment violation\
• noting that defendant was streetwise and thus was capable of understanding his rights and of giving a voluntary state- ment, despite an IQ of 68
• determining that, despite defendant’s I.Q. of only 78, he gave a valid waiver because he received warnings several times both while in custody and for prior crimes
• determining that despite defendant’s IQ of 78, he gave a valid waiver because he received warnings several times, both while in custody for the crime at issue and for prior crimes
• noting that evidence obtained in violation of Miranda is not necessarily tainted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).