· 8/18/1930
Crowell Elevator Co. v. Allen
Citations
- 43 F.2d 772
- 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 168
- 1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1362
- 1930 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9544
- 9 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing judgment for plaintiff because expert testimony was lacking and was required for recovery of damages
- reversing judgment for plaintiff because expert testimony, which was lacking, was required for recovery of damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Woodrough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.