Crowe v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the claimant’s subsequent employment had not contributed to her back disability, since she “merely experienced continuing symptoms and increased pain from her original injury when she engaged in continued activity”
• concluding that the claimant's subsequent employment had not contributed to her back disability, since she \merely experienced continuing symptoms and increased pain from her original injury when she engaged in continued activity\
• stating, “[T]here must be evidence of a second injury which materially contributed to the claimant’s disability.” (quotations and citations omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).