Crowe v. Bolduc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adding that counsel must “clarify whether the in limine ruling was final or not” if there is any doubt
• holding that witnesses' financial incentives were \classic evidence of bias\
• noting that, when considering a motion for judgment as a matter of law, district courts are required to weight their review “toward preservation of the jury ver- dict”
• approving a jury finding that the letter agreement imposed that obligation on Bolduc
• allowing fact witnesses paid on contingency to be cross-examined for bias
• “Our circuit rule has now been codified in a 2000 amendment to Rule 103, Federal Rules of Evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).